Now, let’s talk about the two main types of vector stores: those that use machine-learned models to generate dense vectors and those that use heuristic weighting functions to define the dimensions of the vector space. Machine-learned models, like DPR (Dense Passage Ranking), are trained on large datasets to learn the mapping between the input text and the corresponding dense vector representation. These models are capable of capturing complex contextual relationships in the data, leading to better retrieval performance than traditional bag-of-words models. On the other hand, heuristic weighting functions, like BM25, rely on predefined rules to define the dimensions of the vector space, making them more interpretable but potentially less effective at capturing contextual relationships.
So, what’s the state of the art in dense retrieval models? The popular bi-encoder architecture has emerged as the dominant conceptual framework for organizing retrieval models today. This design forms the basis of nearest-neighbor search, where the system compares the query vector with the vectors of potential matches to find the k most similar pieces of content. The choice of whether to use machine-learned models or heuristic weighting functions depends on the specific application and the tradeoffs between accuracy and interpretability.
But here’s the thing: despite their promise, dense retrieval models still have limitations. For example, they can be less effective than traditional bag-of-words models in certain scenarios, such as when the query is very vague or when there are many irrelevant documents in the database. Additionally, these models require a large amount of computational resources and training data to achieve good performance, which can be a challenge for smaller organizations or those with limited resources.
In conclusion, while dense retrieval models have revolutionized the way we retrieve information, they’re not without their limitations. By understanding the basics of vector stores and the different types of models used, we can better appreciate the tradeoffs between accuracy and interpretability when designing a search system. So the next time you use Google to find something, remember that there’s more to it than just a simple query-and-retrieve process – there’s a complex web of algorithms and modeling techniques working behind the scenes to deliver the best results possible!
Computer Science, Information Retrieval